fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic). We offer the best price for the best call girls Lisbon can find. Mikä on ollut voimakkain orgasmisi, jonka olet koskaan saanut? Ruotsalaiset Naiset Etsii Seksiseuraa Nord Trøndelag big-ass-fuck Search Amarillo helsinki ikäraja treffi seksi - Seksikertomuksia swedish Nipukka satu salmi hyvinkä hieronta kuopio kuvia seuraa mikkeli kostamus naiset. Sukupuolitautien poliklinikalla tutkitaan ja hoidetaan sukupuolitauteja sairastavia potilaita sekä annetaan ennaltaehkäisevä neuvontaa. Kokkola City Run - Home Facebook Kempele on hyvä paikka yrityksille. Shemale- Eduardaa-2516725 Eduarda big dick Shemale Escort So Paulo.
Even where a topic is presented in terms of facts rather than opinions, inappropriate tone can be introduced through the way in which facts are selected, presented, or organized. Sanger in 2001 suggested that avoiding bias as one of Wikipedia's "rules to consider". Try the library for reputable books and journal articles, and look online for the most reliable resources. All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view nPOV which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. This is a concern especially in relation to recent events that may be in the news.
Aikuisviihde ilmainen ruskea valkovuoto - Hot Milf
For advice on applying this policy, see the npov tutorial. For instance, "John Doe is the best baseball player" expresses an opinion and cannot be asserted in Wikipedia as if it were a fact. Ensure that the reporting of different views on a subject adequately reflects the relative levels of support for those views, and that it does not give a false impression of parity, or give undue weight to a particular view. It can be included as a factual statement about the opinion: "John Doe's baseball skills have been praised by baseball insiders such as Al Kaline and Joe Torre." Opinions must still be verifiable and appropriately cited. Some editors argue that biased sources should not be used because they introduce improper POV to an article. However, when reputable sources contradict one another and are relatively equal in prominence, describe both points of view and work for balance. The original npov policy statement on Wikipedia was added by Sanger on December 26, 2001.
Ilmaiset Suomalaiset Seksivideot: Aikuisviihde ilmainen ruskea valkovuoto
See fringe theories guideline and the npov FAQ. 5 While it is important to account for all significant viewpoints on any topic, Wikipedia policy does not state or imply that every minority view or extraordinary claim needs to be presented along with commonly accepted mainstream scholarship as if they were of equal validity. Article structure Further information: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout The internal structure of an article may require additional attention, to protect neutrality, and to avoid problems like POV forking and undue weight. While pseudoscience may in some cases be significant to an article, it should not obfuscate the description of the mainstream views of the scientific community. The sections below offer specific guidance on common problems. Development of the undue-weight section also started in 2003, for which a mailing-list post by Wales in September was instrumental. This is true not only in evolutionary biology, but also in philosophy, history, physics, etc. For frequent critiques and responses, see the npov FAQ. For the essay on how to describe points of view, see. Although multiple terms may be in common usage, a single name should be chosen as the article title, in line with the article titling policy (and relevant guidelines such as on geographical names ). See also the guide to layout, formatting of criticism, edit warring, cleanup templates, and the unbalanced-opinion template. Being neutral There's no such thing as objectivity Everybody with any philosophical sophistication knows that we all have biases. The verifiability policy was established in 2003 to ensure accuracy of articles by encouraging editors to cite sources. Wikipedia policy "Wikipedia:Point of view" redirects here. Present opinions and conflicting findings in a disinterested tone. However, a brief, unobtrusive pointer might be appropriate. Neutral articles are written with a tone that provides an unbiased, accurate, and proportionate representation of all positions included in the article. See " No original research " and " Verifiability ". A proper understanding and application of npov is sought in all areas of Wikipedia, but it is often needed most in these. 2 Due and undue weight Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources. A neutral characterization of disputes requires presenting viewpoints with a consistently impartial tone; otherwise articles end up as partisan commentaries even while presenting all relevant points of view. When there is a consensus of opinion on scientific matters, providing an opposite view without consideration escort lissabon escort estonia
of 'due weight' can lead to 'false balance meaning that viewers might perceive an issue to be more controversial than it actually. Morally offensive views What about views that are morally offensive to most readers, such as Holocaust denial, that some people actually hold?
Tämä viesti on lähetetty Myydaan seksia
julkaistu. Anna kirjanmerkki permalinkille